Accessibility statement

Compliance status

Test results

The RGAA 4.1.2 compliance audit carried out by the company Ipedis on behalf of BivwAk! / BNP Paribas reveals that:

  • The compliance rate with RGAA 4.1.2 measured on the sample is 62.69%

This percentage corresponds to:

  • 42 compliant criteria
  • 25 non-compliant criteria
  • 39 criteria not applicable

Content not accessible

The contents listed below are not accessible for the following reasons:

Nonconformity

List of non-compliant criteria:

  • 1.2. Some decorative images are not ignored by a screen reader.
  • 1.3. Some alternative texts for informative images are not relevant.
  • 3.1. Some information is conveyed by color alone.
  • 3.2. Some texts offer insufficient contrast with their background.
  • 3.3. Some components or graphic elements offer insufficient contrast with their background.
  • 4.1. Some media (audio, video) lack text transcripts or audio descriptions.
  • 6.1. The label and context of some links do not make their function or destination clear.
  • 6.2. Some links lack a label.
  • 7.1. Some scripts are not compatible with screen readers.
  • 7.3. Some scripts cannot be controlled via keyboard navigation.
  • 8.2. Some pages have invalid source code: writing rules, opening, closing, and nesting of elements, uniqueness of id attributes.
  • 8.6. The title of some pages is not relevant.
  • 8.9. Some HTML tags are used solely for visual presentation purposes.
  • 9.1. On some pages, information is not properly structured using headings (h1, h2, etc.).
  • 9.2. On some pages, the document structure is inconsistent (landmark regions).
  • 9.3. Some lists are not marked as such.
  • 9.4. Some quotes are not marked as such.
  • 10.1. Information presentation is built using HTML elements rather than CSS.
  • 10.3. Some information becomes incomprehensible when CSS is disabled.
  • 10.6. Some non-obvious links are not highlighted with contrasting colors or visual changes on keyboard focus or mouse hover.
  • 11.10. Some form fields do not properly validate input.
  • 11.13. Some form fields do not facilitate auto-fill.
  • 12.1. Some pages do not offer at least two navigation systems (menu, sitemap, search…).
  • 12.8. On certain pages, the tab order is not consistent.
  • 13.3. Some office documents are not accessible and do not have an alternative.

Content not subject to the accessibility requirement:

  • Files available in desktop formats published before September 23, 2018;
  • Third-party content that is not funded or developed by, and is not under the control of, the applicable agency

Establishment of this accessibility requirement

This statement was established on 31/10/2024.

Technologies used for the realisation of the website:

  • HTML
  • CSS
  • Javascript

Evaluation environment

Verification of content rendering was performed on the basis of the following combinations of browsers and screen readers:

  • NVDA, Firefox

Tools used in the accessibility evaluation:

  • Colour Contrast Analyzer
  • HeadingsMap
  • Web developer
  • ARC Toolkit
  • TanaguruwebextRGAA4
  • Taba11y

Pages of the website which have been the subject of conformity verification:

Feedback and contact

If you are unable to access any content or service, you can contact the website manager to be directed to an accessible alternative or obtain the content in another format.

Remediation

This procedure is to be used in the following case: You have reported an issue to the website manager that prevents you from accessing any of the site’s content, and you have not received a satisfactory response